errors4

exercises/error_handling/errors2.rs

@@ -16,14 +16,12 @@
 // There are at least two ways to implement this that are both correct-- but
 // one is a lot shorter! Execute `rustlings hint errors2` for hints to both ways.
 
-// I AM NOT DONE
-
 use std::num::ParseIntError;
 
 pub fn total_cost(item_quantity: &str) -> Result<i32, ParseIntError> {
     let processing_fee = 1;
     let cost_per_item = 5;
-    let qty = item_quantity.parse::<i32>();
+    let qty = item_quantity.parse::<i32>()?;
 
     Ok(qty * cost_per_item + processing_fee)
 }

exercises/error_handling/errors3.rs

@@ -4,15 +4,13 @@
 // Why not? What should we do to fix it?
 // Execute `rustlings hint errors3` for hints!
 
-// I AM NOT DONE
-
 use std::num::ParseIntError;
 
 fn main() {
     let mut tokens = 100;
     let pretend_user_input = "8";
 
-    let cost = total_cost(pretend_user_input)?;
+    let cost = total_cost(pretend_user_input).unwrap();
 
     if cost > tokens {
         println!("You can't afford that many!");

exercises/error_handling/errors4.rs

@@ -1,8 +1,6 @@
 // errors4.rs
 // Make this test pass! Execute `rustlings hint errors4` for hints :)
 
-// I AM NOT DONE
-
 #[derive(PartialEq, Debug)]
 struct PositiveNonzeroInteger(u64);
 
@@ -14,7 +12,13 @@ enum CreationError {
 
 impl PositiveNonzeroInteger {
     fn new(value: i64) -> Result<PositiveNonzeroInteger, CreationError> {
-        Ok(PositiveNonzeroInteger(value as u64))
+        if value >= 1 {
+            Ok(PositiveNonzeroInteger(value as u64))
+        } else if value == 0 {
+            Err(CreationError::Zero)
+        } else {
+            Err(CreationError::Negative)
+        }
     }
 }